Comparison between Fluid Attacks and YesWeHack | Fluid Attacks

YesWeHack

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to YesWeHack's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
YesWeHack 
Focus
AI-Powered PTaaS on top of Native ASPM with Built-In Scanners
Extras
None
None
Employees

377

Reputation
9.82 from 60 reviews over 6 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
9.42 from 58 reviews over 3 years on G2 and Gartner
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
85K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research Firms
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$47.74M USD in 3 rounds from 9 investors
Revenue
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
No
Compliance
Documentation
Visits
27K per month. Top 3: 51% BR, 8% IN, 7% CO and others 34%
15K per month. Top 3: 18% IN, 14% AE, 13% NP and others 55%
Authority
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Marketplaces AWS
Freemium
No
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing drivers

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
YesWeHack
PTaaS
No
Yes (as part of the bug bounty program)
Reverse engineering
No
Yes Yes
Secure code review
No
No information available
Pivoting
No
No information available
Exploitation
No
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
Independent researchers centralize zero-day vulnerabilities on a platform
SLA
Response
Accreditations
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Pending
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, none in common
All requirements from the same standards
standards, none in common
Detection method
Remediation
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
Same, plus 1
2, 1 in common and 1 additional
Outputs
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Same, plus 2
4, 2 in common and 2 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
YesWeHack
ASPM
Yes
No
IDE
Same, plus 1 functionality
No
CLI
No
CI/CD
Does not break the build
SCA
No
Reachability
No
SBOM
No
Containers
No
Source SAST (languages)
No
Source SAST (frameworks)

No

Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST

No

IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
No
Secrets
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
No
AI
No
Open source
Not applicable
No
Deployment
Regions
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
YesWeHack
SCM
None
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 2 in common and 1 additional

4, 2 in common and 2 additional

ChatOps
None
None

1

IDE

None

CI/CD
None
SCA

None

Container

None

SAST

None

DAST

None

IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
None
CSPM
None
Secrets

None

Compliance
None
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Mar 18, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.