ArmorCode
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to ArmorCode's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
ArmorCode
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$65M USD in 5 rounds from 13 investors
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
|
None
|
|
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
CSA STAR Level 1, ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 Type II | |
|
Documentation
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS and GitHub | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
No
|
||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
No information available
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
ArmorCode
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Zero-day vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
No information available | ||
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65 standards, 15 in common and 50 additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
|
|
Detection
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
2, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
ArmorCode
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes | ||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not break the build
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
SBOM
|
No
|
||
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
Same, plus 4
|
No
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
No |
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
|||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
ArmorCode
|
|
SCM
|
4, all in common
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
4, 2 in common and 2 additional |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
None |
||
|
CI/CD
|
20, 8 in common and 12 additional
|
9, 8 in common and 1 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Container
|
|||
|
SAST
|
|||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
||
|
CSPM
|
13 | ||
|
Secrets
|
|||
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.