Hackmetrix
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Hackmetrix's? The following comparison table enables you to
discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s
cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Hackmetrix
|
|
Focus
|
Regulatory compliance
|
||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
MPT
|
|
Headcount
|
66 | ||
|
Headcount distribution
|
Engineering 42%, IT 13%, sales 13%,
marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%
|
Engineering 23%, IT 17%, sales 8%,
marketing 5%, operations 6% and others 41%
|
|
|
Headcount growth
|
+8%, +10%, -8%
|
-8%, 0%, 0%
|
|
|
Headquarters
|
CO and US
|
AR, CL and MX
|
|
|
Countries
|
AR, BO, CA, CL, CO, DO, MX, PA, PE and
US
|
AR, CL, CO and MX
|
|
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
No reviews
|
|
|
Followers
|
Same
|
21K based on the following: Instagram,
LinkedIn, X and YouTube
|
|
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 |
2017
|
|
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$3M USD in 6 rounds from 13 investors
|
|
Acquisitions
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Revenue
|
10M to 15M
|
10M to 50M
|
|
|
CVEs as CNA Researcher
|
Not applicable, as it is not a CNA
Researcher
|
||
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2Type II and SOC 3
|
ISO/IEC 27001
|
|
|
Bug bounty
|
No
|
||
|
Visits
|
21K
per month. Top 3: 26% CO, 8% FR, 7% US. Others 59%
|
22K per month. Top 3: 30% MX, 24% CO,
20% US. Others 26%
|
|
|
Authority
|
28 out of 100
|
||
|
Public vulnerability DB
|
Discovered and third-party
|
None
|
|
|
Content
|
Same
|
Blog, checklist and e-books
|
|
| Comprehensive documentation |
No
|
||
|
Community
|
No
|
||
|
Sync training
|
1 workshop
|
No | |
|
Async training
|
3 product use courses, all free
|
1 security education course (free)
|
|
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
Direct
|
|
| Marketplaces | AWS | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
PoV
|
||
|
Demo
|
Yes
|
||
|
Open demo
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Pricing
|
Contact sales and marketplaces
|
||
|
Pricing tiers
|
1 plan
|
1 plan
|
3 plans (ISO27001 compliance, PCI DSS compliance, ethical hacking). First 2 transparent |
|
Minimum term
|
Annually
|
||
|
Minimum payment period
|
Annually
|
||
|
Minimum capabilities
|
ASPM, binary SAST, containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and
secrets
|
Same plus: API security testing, PTaaS, RE and SCR
|
MPT
|
|
Minimum scope
|
1 author
|
No information available
|
|
|
Pricing drivers
|
Hours
|
||
|
Free implementation
|
No information available
|
||
|
Free support
|
No information available
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Hackmetrix
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No. MPT
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
No information available | |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No information available
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No information available
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
Yes
|
|
|
Manual reattacks
|
Not applicable
|
1 reattack | |
|
Zero-day
vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
No | ||
|
Minimum availability
|
>=99.95% per minute LTM
|
None
|
|
|
After-sale guarantees
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
12 from 4 different types
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
Employee
|
|
Endpoint control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No
|
|
Channel control
|
Not applicable
|
Total
|
No
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 67 standards, 7 in common and 60
additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
10 standards, 7 in common and
3additional
|
|
Detection method
|
Automated tools, AI and human intelligence
|
Human intelligence
|
|
|
Remediation
|
5, 1 in common and 4 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
1 in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 1 in common and 4
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
1 in common
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Hackmetrix
|
|
ASPM
|
No
|
||
|
API
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
No
|
|
|
CLI
|
No
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
Does not break the build
|
||
|
Vulnerability sources
|
4 sources
|
None
|
|
|
Threat model alignment
|
No
|
||
|
Priority criteria
|
CVSS
|
||
|
Custom prioritization
|
No
|
||
|
Scanner origin
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
No
|
||
|
AI security
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
No
|
|
|
Reachability type
|
Not applicable
|
||
|
SBOM
|
No | ||
|
Malware detection
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
Autofix on components
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Containers
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
(languages)
|
No
|
||
|
Source SAST
frameworks)
|
No
|
||
|
Custom rules
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
IaC
|
No
|
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
No
|
||
|
API security testing
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
ASM
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors
and secrets exploitability
|
No
|
|
|
AI
|
No | ||
|
MCP
|
No
|
||
|
Open source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Provisioning as code
|
No
|
||
|
Deployment
|
SaaS (no tenancy information)
|
||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
No
|
||
|
Incidents
|
No information available
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Hackmetrix
|
|
SCM
|
None
|
||
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
1 in common
|
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
1 |
|
IDE
|
None
|
||
|
CI/CD
|
None
|
||
|
SCA
|
None
|
||
|
Container
|
None | ||
|
SAST
|
None
|
||
|
DAST
|
None
|
||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
None
|
||
|
CSPM
|
None | ||
|
Secrets
|
None
|
||
|
Remediation
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Bug bounty
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Vulnerability management
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
The latest update to this comparison was on Dec 15, 2025. The primary source of information was
hackmetrix.com, which was supplemented by specialized information-gathering sites, social media,
and other sources.
More like Hackmetrix
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start
your 21-day free trial and discover the
benefits of the Continuous
Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the
Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.