Codacy

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Codacy's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Codacy
Focus	Native ASPM with In-house scanners	AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners	Native ASPM and External scanners
Extras	None	None	None
Headcount	136	Same	71
Headcount Distribution	Engineering 40%, TI 15%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%	Same	Engineering 30%, TI 11%, sales 13%, marketing 4%, operations 8% and others 34%
Headcount Growth	+3%, -2%, -7%	Same	+9%, +4%, -9%
Headquarters	86% CO	Same	66% PT
Countries	CO and US	Same	PT and US
Reputation	9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch	Same	9.37 from 50 reviews over 9 years on Capterra, G2, Gartner and TrustRadius
Followers	20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube	Same	28K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms	None	None	Omdia
Founded	2001	Same	2012
Funding	Bootstrapped	Same	$29.4M USD in 5 round from 10 investors
Acquisitions	None	None	None
Revenue	5M to 10M	Same	5M to 25M
CVE	257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide	Same	0 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3	Same	SOC 2 Type I and SOC 2 Type II
Bug Bounty	Yes	Yes	Yes
Visits	19K per month. Top 3: 50% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others 27%	Same	54K per month. Top 3: 19% US, 13% BR, 10% IN and others 58%
Authority	32 out of 100	Same	38 out of 100
Vulnerability database	Discovered	Same	None
Content	Blog, documentation, e-books, reports, videos, webinars and white papers	Same	Blog, documentation, events, news, webinars and white papers
Knowledge base	13 KB sections, 5 in common and 8 additional	Same	5 KB sections, all in common
Community	Forum	Same	No
Sync training	No	No	No
Async training	3 product use courses, all free	Same	No
Distribution	Direct or with any of its 14 partners	Same	Direct
Marketplaces	AWS	Same	AWS and GitHub
Freemium	No	No	Yes
Free trial	21-day free trial	PoV	14-day free trial
Demo	Yes	Yes	Yes
Open Demo	No	No	No
Pricing	Contact sales, marketplace and public web	Contact sales and public web	Contact sales, marketplace and public web
Pricing tiers	1 plan	1 plan	3 plans (team, business, audit). First transparent
Minimum commit	Monthly	Monthly	Monthly
Minimum payment period	Monthly	Monthly	Monthly
Minimum capabilities	API security Testing, ASPM, Binary SAST, Containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets	Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR	IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets
Minimum scope	1 group	1 author	1 developer
Pricing drivers	Groups	Authors	Developers
Minimum monthly payment	1.529 USD	1.529 + 429 USD	21 USD

Service

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Codacy
PTaaS	No	Yes	No
Reverse engineering	No	Yes	No
Secure code review	No	Yes	No
Pivoting	No	Yes	No
Exploitation	No	Yes	No
Manual reattacks	Not applicable	Unlimited reattacks	Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities	None	Continuous zero-day vulnerability research	None
SLA	Availability	Accuracy, availability and response	No information available
Min availability	>=99.95% per minute LTM	Same	No information available
After-sale guarantees	No	Yes	No
Accreditations	CNA and Penetration testing by CREST	Same	None
Hacker certifications	Not applicable	202 from 59 different types	Not applicable
Type of contract	Employee	Same	Employee or freelance
Endpoint control	Not applicable	Total	Not applicable
Channel control	Not applicable	Total	Not applicable
Standards	Some requirements from 65 standards, 3 in common and 62 additional	All requirements from the same standards	3 standards, all in common
Detection method	Automated tools	Automated tools, AI and human intelligence	Automated tools and AI
Remediation	5, 4 in common and 1 additional	Same, plus 1	4, all in common
Outputs	5, 1 in common and 4 additional	Same, plus 2	2, 1 in common and 1 additional

Product

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Codacy
ASPM	Yes	Yes	Yes
API	GraphQL with JSON	Same	REST with JSON
IDE	5 functionalities, 4 in common and 1 additional	Same, plus 1 functionality	4 functionalities, all in common
CLI	Yes	Yes	Yes
CI/CD	Breaks the build	Same	Breaks the build
Vulnerability sources	4 sources	Same	None
Priority criteria	CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV	Same	CVSS
Custom prioritization	Priority score	Same	No
Scanner origin	In-house	In-house	External (ZAP for DAST; Checkov for IaC; Semgrep, Bandit, Brakeman, Flawfinder, and Gosec for SAST; Checkov and Semgrep for Secrets; and Trivy for Containers, Secrets and SCA)
SCA	23 package managers, 14 in common and 9 additional	Same	24 package managers, 14 in common and 10 additional
AI security	No	Yes	No
Reachability	12 languages	Same	No
Reachability type	Deterministic	Same	Not applicable
SBOM	22 package managers, 17 in common and 5 additional	Same	24 package managers, 17 in common and 7 additional
Malware detection	Yes	Yes	No
Autofix on components	No	No	No
Containers	4 distributions, 2 in common and 2 additional	Same	15 distributions, 2 in common and 13 additional
Source SAST (languages)	12, all in common	Same	29, 12 in common and 17 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)	22, 6 in common and 16 additional	Same	7, 6 in common and 1 additional
Custom rules	No	No	No
IaC	6, 4 in common and 2 additional	4, 2 in common and 2 additional	6, all in common
Binary SAST	1 type of binary	Same, plus 2 types of binaries	No
DAST	7 attack surface types, 3 in common and 4 additional	Same	4 attack surface types, 3 in common and 1 additional
API security Testing	No	4 types of APIs, 3 in common and 1 additional	3 types of APIs, all in common
IAST	No	No	No
CSPM	Yes	Yes	No
ASM	No	No	No
Secrets	15 secrets types, 11 in common and 4 additional	Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability	31 secrets types, 11 in common and 20 additional
AI	3 functions	Same	3 functions, all in common
MCP	Yes	Yes	Yes
Open-source	MPL-2.0 license, totally equivalent to the paid version	Not applicable	No
Provisioning as Code	Yes	Yes	Yes
Deployment	SaaS	Same	SaaS and on-premises
Regions	US	Same	IE
Status	Yes	Yes	Yes
Incidents	6 per year	Same	4.5 per year

Integrations

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Codacy
SCM	6, 3 in common and 3 additional	Same	3, all in common
Binary repositories	None	None	1
Ticketing	3, 1 in common and 2 additional	Same	1 in common
ChatOps	None	None	1
IDE	3, all in common	Same	19, 3 in common and 16 additional
CI/CD	20, 3 in common and 17 additional	Same	3, all in common
SCA	Native	Same	Native powered by Trivy
Container	Native	Same	Native powered by Trivy
SAST	Native	Same	Native powered by Semgrep, Bandit, Brakeman, Flawfinder and Golang
DAST	Native	Same	Native powered by ZAP
IAST	None	None	None
Cloud	3	Same	None
CSPM	Native	Same	None
Secrets	Native	Same	Native powered by Checkov, Semgrep and Trivy
Remediation	None	None	None
Bug bounty	None	None	None
Vulnerability management	None	None	None
Compliance	None	None	None

References were last checked on Sep 18, 2025.

More like Codacy

Free trial

Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.

Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Codacy | Fluid Attacks

Codacy