Jit

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Jit's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Jit
Focus	Native ASPM with In-house scanners	AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with In-house scanners	Native ASPM with external scanners
Extras	None	None	None
Headcount	136	Same	121
Headcount distribution	Engineering 40%, IT 15%, sales 13%, marketing 2%, operations 4% and others 26%	Same	Engineering 17%, IT 5%, sales 9%, marketing 6%, operations 7% and others 56%
Headcount growth	+3%, -2%, -7%	Same	+3%, +18%, +40%
Headquarters	86% CO	Same	29% IL
Countries	CO and US	Same	US
Reputation	9.79 from 161 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch	Same	10 from 43 reviews over 1 year on G2, Gartner and GetApp
Followers	20K based on the following: Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, X and YouTube	Same	5K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms	None	None	None
Founded	2001	Same	2021
Funding	Bootstrapped	Same	$38.5M USD in 1 rounds from 5 investors
Acquisitions	None	None	None
Revenue	5M to 10M	Same	1M to 15M
CVE	257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide	Same	0 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance	SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3	Same	SOC 2 Type II
Bug bounty	Yes	Yes	No
Visits	19K per month. Top 3: 50% NL, 17% CO, 6% US and others 27%	Same	40K per month. Top 3: 15% IN, 13% US, 10% IL and others 62%
Authority	32 out of 100	Same	34 out of 100
Vulnerability database	Discovered and third-party	Same	None
Content	Blog, documentation, e-books, reports, success stories, videos, webinars and white papers	Same	Blog, documentation and webinars
Knowledge base	13 KB sections, 3 in common and 10 additional	Same	9 KB sections, 3 in common and 6 additional
Community	Forum	Same	No
Sync training	1 workshop	Same	No
Async training	3 product use courses, all free	Same	No
Distribution	Direct or with any of its 14 partners	Same	Direct or with any of its partners
Marketplaces	AWS	Same	AWS, GCP and GitHub
Freemium	No	No	Yes
Free trial	21-day free trial	PoV	14-day free trial
Demo	Yes	Yes	Yes
Open Demo	No	No	No
Pricing	Contact sales, marketplace and public web	Contact sales and public web	Contact sales, marketplaces and public web
Pricing tiers	1 plan	1 plan	2 plans (growth, enterprise). First transparent
Minimum term	Monthly	Monthly	Annually
Minimum payment period	Monthly	Monthly	Monthly
Minimum capabilities	API security Testing, ASPM, Binary SAST, Containers, CSPM, DAST, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets	Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR	ASPM, Containers, CSPM, IaC, SAST, SCA and secrets
Minimum scope	1 group	1 author	4 developers
Pricing drivers	Groups	Authors	Developers
Minimum monthly payment	1,529 USD	1,529 + 429 USD	200 USD

Service

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Jit
PTaaS	No	Yes	No
Reverse engineering	No	Yes	No
Secure code review	No	Yes	No
Pivoting	No	Yes	No
Exploitation	No	Yes	No
Manual reattacks	Not applicable	Unlimited reattacks	Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities	None	Continuous zero-day vulnerability research	None
SLA	Availability	Accuracy, availability and response	Availability
Min availability	>=99.95% per minute LTM	Same	>=99.5% per month
After-sale guarantees	No	Yes	No
Accreditations	CNA and Penetration Testing by CREST	Same	Security ISV Competency
Hacker certifications	Not applicable	202 from 59 different types	Not applicable
Type of contract	Employee	Same	Employee or freelance
Endpoint control	Not applicable	Total	Not applicable
Channel control	Not applicable	Total	Not applicable
Standards	Some requirements from 67 standards, 12 in common and 55 additional	All requirements from the same standards	16 standards, 12 in common and 4 additional
Detection method	Automated tools	Automated tools, AI and human intelligence	Automated tools
Remediation	5, 3 in common and 2 additional	Same, plus 1	3, all in common
Outputs	5, 3 in common and 2 additional	Same, plus 2	4, 3 in common and 1 additional

Product

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Jit
ASPM	Yes	Yes	Yes
API	GraphQL with JSON	Same	REST with JSON
IDE	5 functionalities, 3 in common and 2 additional	Same, plus 1 functionality	4 functionalities, 3 in common and 1 additional
CLI	Yes	Yes	Yes
CI/CD	Breaks the build	Same	Breaks the build
Vulnerability sources	4 sources, 2 in common and 2 additional	Same	3 sources, 2 in common and 1 additional
Threat model alignment	Yes	Yes	No
Priority criteria	CVSS v4.0, CVSSF, EPSS and KEV	Same	CVSS
Custom prioritization	Priority score	Same	Risk score
Scanner origin	In-house	In-house	External (Trivy for Containers; AWS Security Hub and Prowler for CSPM; ZAP for DAST; KICS and Kubescape for Iac; GoSec and Semgrep for SAST; Grype and Syft for SBOM; Nancy, NPM-Audit and OSV for SCA; GitLeaks and TruffleHog for Secrets)
SCA	23 package managers, 8 in common and 15 additional	Same	8 package managers, all in common
AI security	No	Yes	No
Reachability	12 languages	Same	Yes. No information available
Reachability type	Deterministic	Same	Deterministic
SBOM	22 package managers, 17 in common and 5 additional	Same	29 package managers, 17 in common and 12 additional
Malware detection	Yes	Yes	No
Autofix on components	No	No	Yes
Containers	4 distributions	Same	Yes. No information available
Source SAST (languages)	12, 11 in common and 1 additional	Same	14 languages, 11 in common and 3 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)	22	Same	Yes. No information available
Custom rules	No	No	SAST
IaC	6, 2 in common and 4 additional	4	5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Binary SAST	1 type of binary	Same, plus 2 types of binaries	No
DAST	7 attack surface types, 5 in common and 2 additional	Same	3 attack surface types, 2 in common and 1 additional
API security testing	No	4 types of APIs, 3 in common and 1 additional	3 types of APIs, all in common
IAST	No	No	No
CSPM	Yes	Yes	Yes
ASM	No	No	No
Secrets	15 secrets types, 3 in common and 12 additional	Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability	5 secret types, 3 in common and 2 additional
AI	3 functions, 2 in common and 1 additional	Same	2 functions, all in common
MCP	Yes	Yes	Yes
Open-source	MPL-2.0 license, totally equivalent to the paid version	Not applicable	No
Provisioning as Code	Yes	Yes	No
Deployment	SaaS	Same	SaaS
Regions	US	Same	US
Status	Yes	Yes	Yes
Incidents	4 per year	Same	0.3 per year

Integrations

Attribute	Essential	Advanced	Jit
SCM	6, 4 in common and 2 additional	Same	4, all in common
Binary repositories	None	None	None
Ticketing	3, 1 in common and 2 additional	Same	4, 1 in common and 3 additional
ChatOps	None	None	2
IDE	3	Same	3, all in com mon
CI/CD	21, 4 in common and 17 additional	Same	4, all in common
SCA	Native	Same	Native powered by Nancy, NPM-Audit and OVS
Container	Native	Same	Native powered by Trivy
SAST	Native	Same	Native powered by GoSec and Semgrep
DAST	Native	Same	Native powered by ZAP
IAST	None	None	None
Cloud	3	Same	3, all in common
CSPM	Native	Same	Native powered by Prowler
Secrets	Native	Same	Native powered by Gitleaks and Trufflehog
Remediation	None	None	None
Bug bounty	None	None	None
Vulnerability management	None	None	Native
Compliance	None	None	1

References were last checked on Oct 24, 2025.

More like Jit

Free trial

Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.

Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Jit | Fluid Attacks

Jit