Comparison between Fluid Attacks and Jit | Fluid Attacks

Jit

How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Jit's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company's cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.

Organization
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Jit
Focus
AI-powered PTaaS on top of native ASPM with built-in scanners
Extras
None
None
None
Headcount

110

Headcount distribution
Headcount growth
Headquarters
Countries
CO and US
Reputation
9.84 from 109 reviews over 7 years on Gartner and Clutch
Same
10.00 from 43 reviews over 1 year on G2, Gartner and GetApp
Followers
18K based on the following: FacebookInstagramLinkedInX and YouTube
Same
4K based on the following: Facebook, LinkedIn, X and YouTube
Research firms
None
None
None
Founded
2001
Funding
Bootstrapped
Same
$38.5M USD in 1 rounds from 5 investors
Acquisitions
None
None
None
Revenue
0.1M to 50M
CVE
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
Compliance
SOC 2 Type II
Bug bounty
No
Visits
20K per month. Top 3: 21% CO, 16% US, 10% IN and others 53%
36K per month. Top 321% IN, 15% US, 9% IL and others 55%
Authority
Vulnerability database
Content
Same
Knowledge base
13 KB sections, 3 in common and 10 additional
KB sections, 3 in common and 6 additional
Community
No
Sync training
No
No
No
Async training
No
Distribution
Direct or with any of its 14 partners
Same
Direct or with any of its partners
Marketplaces AWS, GCP and GitHub
Freemium
No
No
Free trial
Demo
Pricing
Pricing tiers
3 plans (community, growth, enterprise). First 2 transparent
Minimum commit
Minimum payment period
Minimum capabilities
Same plus: PTaaS, RE and SCR
Minimum scope
Pricing drivers
Minimum monthly payment

Service
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Jit
PTaaS
No
No
Reverse engineering
No
Yes No
Secure code review
No
No
Pivoting
No
No
Exploitation
No
No
Manual reattacks
Not applicable
Not applicable
Zero-day vulnerabilities
None
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
None
SLA
Availability
Min availability
>=99.95% per minute LTM
>=99.5% per month
After-sale guarantees
No
No
No
Accreditations
None
Hacker certifications
Not applicable
Not applicable
Type of contract
Employee
Same
Endpoint control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Channel control
Not applicable
Total
Not applicable
Standards
Some requirements from 65 standards, 12 in common and 53 additional
All requirements from the same standards
16 standards, 12 in common and 4 additional
Detection method
Remediation
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 1
3, all in common
Outputs
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 2
4, 3 in common and 1 additional

Product
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Jit
ASPM
Yes
API
IDE
functionalities, 3 in common and 2 additional
Same, plus 1 functionality
functionalities, 3 in common and 1 additional
CLI
CI/CD
Vulnerability sources
14 sources, 1 in common and 13 additional
2, 1 in common and 1 additional
Priority criteria
CVSS v4.0, CVSSFEPSS and KEV
Same
Custom prioritization
Scanner origin
SCA
24 package managers, 8 in common and 16 additional
8 package managers, all in common
SCA (AI models)
No
No
No
Reachability
Yes. No information available
Reachability type
No information available
SBOM
22 package managers, 17 in common and 5 additional
29 package managers, 17 in common and 12 additional
Malware detection
Yes
Yes
No
Autofix on components
No
No
No
Containers
Yes. No information available
Source SAST (languages)
12, 11 in common and 1 additional
14 languages, 11 in common and 3 additional
Source SAST (frameworks)

Yes. No information available

Custom rules
No
No
Custom rules for SAST
IaC
6, 2 in common and 4 additional
5, 2 in common and 3 additional
Binary SAST
1 type of binary
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
No
DAST
attack surface types, 5 in common and 2 additional

6 attack surface types, 5 in common and 1 additional

API security Testing
No
Yes. No information available
IAST
No
No
No
CSPM
Yes
Environments
Left & Right (included)
Same
ASM
No
No
Secrets
15 secrets types, 3 in common and 12 additional
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
5 secret types, 3 in common and 2 additional
AI
functions, 2 in common and 2 additional
2 functions, all in common
Open-source
Not applicable
No
Provisioning as Code
No
Deployment
Regions
No information available
Status
Incidents

Integrations
Attribute
Essential
Advanced
Jit
SCM
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
2, all in common
Binary repositories
None
None
None
Ticketing
3, 1 in common and 2 additional

4, 1 in common and 3 additional

ChatOps
None
None

1

IDE
3, 1 in common and 2 additional

1 in common

CI/CD
20, 2 in common and 18 additional
2 in common
SCA
Container

Native

SAST
DAST
IAST
None
None
None
Cloud
3, all in common
CSPM
Native and 3 integrations
Secrets
Remediation
None
None
None
Bug bounty
None
None
None
Vulnerability management
None
None
Native and 1 integration
Compliance
None
None

Notes
 References were last checked on Jun 13, 2025.
Free trial message
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.