Jit
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Jit's? The following comparison table enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Jit
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research firms
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$38.5M USD in 1 rounds from 5 investors
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10 CVE labs worldwide
|
None
|
|
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type II and SOC 3
|
SOC 2 Type II | |
|
Documentation
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS, GCP and GitHub | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Jit
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Zero-day vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
Availability | ||
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65 standards, 12 in common and 53 additional
|
All requirements from the same standards
|
16 standards, 12 in common and 4 additional
|
|
Detection
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
Same, plus 1
|
3, all in common
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
4, 3 in common and 1 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Jit
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes | ||
|
IDE
|
5 functionalities, 3 in common and 2 additional
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
4 functionalities, 3 in common and 1 additional
|
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
SCA
|
8 package managers, all in common
|
||
|
Reachability
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
SBOM
|
29 package managers, 17 in common and 12 additional
|
||
|
Containers
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
18, 11 in common and 7 additional
|
Same, plus 4
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
Yes. No information available |
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of binaries
|
No
|
|
DAST
|
10 attack surface types, 5 in common and 5 additional
|
6 attack surface types, 5 in common and 1 additional |
|
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes | ||
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack vectors and secrets exploitability
|
||
|
AI
|
2 functions, all in common
|
||
|
Open-source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions |
No information available
|
||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Jit
|
|
SCM
|
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
2, all in common
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 1 in common and 2 additional
|
4, 1 in common and 3 additional |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
2, 1 in common and 1 additional
|
1 in common |
|
|
CI/CD
|
20, 2 in common and 18 additional
|
2 in common
|
|
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Container
|
|||
|
SAST
|
Native scanner and 1 integration |
||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
||
|
CSPM
|
Native scanner and 3 integrations | ||
|
Secrets
|
|||
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Mar 19, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.