Cycode
How does Fluid Attacks' solution compare to Cycode's? The following comparison table
enables you to discern the performance of both providers across various attributes essential for meeting your
company’s cybersecurity needs. To better understand each attribute, read their descriptions in the
dedicated page.
Organization
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Cycode
|
|
Focus
|
|||
|
Extras
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|
Employees
|
|||
|
Reputation
|
Same
|
||
|
Followers
|
Same
|
||
|
Research Firms
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Founded
|
2001 | ||
|
Funding
|
Bootstrapped
|
Same
|
$80.6M USD in 3 rounds from 6
investors (1 acquisition)
|
|
Revenue
|
|||
|
CVE
|
257 CVEs reported to MITRE, ranked in the top 10
CVE labs
worldwide
|
0 CVEs reported to MITRE
|
|
|
Compliance
|
SOC 2 Type
II and SOC
3
|
||
|
Documentation
|
|||
|
Visits
|
|||
|
Authority
|
|||
|
Distribution
|
Same
|
||
| Marketplaces | AWS, Azure and GCP | ||
|
Freemium
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
Free trial
|
|||
|
Demo
|
|||
|
Pricing
|
|||
|
Pricing drivers
|
Service
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Cycode
|
|
PTaaS
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Reverse engineering
|
No
|
Yes | No |
|
Secure code review
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Pivoting
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Exploitation
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Zero-day vulnerabilities
|
None
|
Continuous zero-day vulnerability
research
|
None
|
|
SLA
|
Availability and response | ||
|
Accreditations
|
None
|
||
|
Hacker certifications
|
Not applicable
|
Not applicable
|
|
|
Type of contract
|
Employee
|
Same
|
|
|
Standards
|
Some requirements from 65
standards, 12 in common and 53
additional
|
All requirements from the same
standards
|
|
|
Detection method
|
|||
|
Remediation
|
5, all in common
|
Same, plus 1
|
5, 4 in common and 1 additional
|
|
Outputs
|
5, 2 in common and 3
additional
|
Same, plus 2
|
4, 2 in common and 2 additional
|
Product
|
Attribute
|
Essential |
Advanced
|
Cycode
|
|
ASPM
|
Yes | ||
|
IDE
|
Same, plus 1 functionality
|
||
|
CLI
|
|||
|
CI/CD
|
|||
|
SCA
|
|||
|
Reachability
|
12 languages
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
SBOM
|
Yes. No information
available
|
||
|
Containers
|
Yes. No information available
|
||
|
Source SAST (languages)
|
18, 14 in common and 4 additional
|
Same, plus 4. 1 in common and 3 additional
|
|
|
Source SAST (frameworks)
|
No information available |
||
|
Binary SAST
|
1 type of
binary
|
Same, plus 2 types of
binaries
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
DAST
|
No |
||
|
IAST
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
|
CSPM
|
Yes |
No
|
|
|
Secrets
|
Same, plus verify other attack
vectors and secrets exploitability
|
Yes. No information available
|
|
|
AI
|
3 functions, all in common
|
||
|
Open source
|
Not applicable
|
No
|
|
|
Deployment
|
|||
| Regions | |||
|
Status
|
|||
|
Incidents
|
Integrations
|
Attribute
|
Essential
|
Advanced
|
Cycode
|
|
SCM
|
4, all in common
|
6, 4 in common and 2 additional
|
|
|
Binary repositories
|
None
|
None
|
|
|
Ticketing
|
3, 2 in common and 1 additional
|
5, 2 in common and 3 additional |
|
|
ChatOps
|
None |
None
|
|
|
IDE
|
2, all in common
|
18, 2 in common and 16 additional |
|
|
CI/CD
|
20, 7 in common and 13
additional
|
9, 7 in common and 2 additional
|
|
|
SCA
|
Native scanner and 13 integrations |
||
|
Container
|
|||
|
SAST
|
Native scanner and 10 integrations |
||
|
DAST
|
|||
|
IAST
|
None |
None
|
None
|
|
Cloud
|
3, all in common
|
||
|
CSPM
|
8 | ||
|
Secrets integrations
|
|||
|
Compliance
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
References were last checked on Apr 11, 2025.
Free trial
Search for vulnerabilities in your apps for free with Fluid
Attacks' automated security testing! Start your 21-day free trial and discover the benefits of the Continuous Hacking Essential plan. If you prefer the Advanced plan, which
includes the expertise of Fluid Attacks' hacking team, fill out this contact form.